![]() ![]() That said, a lot of my work (and my company’s) is dictated by the client and their requirements – can’t load new libraries or different libraries if using Java, can only use the particular version of. Having just completed a C# project (heresy to some in this group :-)), I needed a quick and dirty test routine to write a file with specific info in that the C# program would read and parse. No matter what we all think, it’ll be Microsoft who will eventually dictate the outcome (and therefore the usage) of VB6 in the long run. I’m sure there are lots of other cases, but that seems to be the majority of what I run into. NET in ’01 or ’03 when the technology was in its infancy, and have never bothered to actually look again now that it’s extremely mature, or formed some opinion based on what others have said, without actually bothering to check it out for themselves. ![]() I also think there are people that have an opinion that’s either based on some article they read about. People converting large legacy apps to modern technology, but haven’t gotten it done yet (This was me until recently). People maintaining older freeware, or even small commercial apps that don’t really change, and don’t generate enough revenue to justify conversion. I’d suspect that many of these folks are internal developers writing things for enterprise use, or internal apps… not necessarily writing commercial products (i.e., not working for software development companies, but developing software as a department within a company or organization with some other primary focus). People that are maintaining large legacy apps, and don’t have the budget / time / etc to convert. There’s nothing wrong with this, it just is what it is. Many of them see no advantage to all of these newfangled things like Classes, inheritance, or really progress in general, and don’t understand many of the core concepts that are involved in more advanced languages (and even in VB6). People that never really learned “Software Development”, but just learned to code in VB6 will hang onto it long term. That said, you’ll find a few of groups of people that still work with it. Now that I’m done with it, I can honestly say that there’s no amount of money that would get me to take any job using VB6. It held me back, it held my company back, and it cost me tons of money converting all of the code we wrote in VB6 to. NET since ’05, I wish I hadn’t held onto VB6 for as long as I did. Get Analytic Report on the areas (procedures and functions) of the program that perform various manipulations with files, registry, windows, processes, as well as using service functions of Visual Basic to call functions by name (CallByName) and direct access to memory addresses (VarPtr).Many of us have “moved on”. ![]() Code will not started and will be emulated by VB Decompiler. Tracing code from procedures and functions of Native Code compiled Visual Basic 5.0/6.0 applications. Using VB Decompiler to decompile copyrighted code, commercial code, malware analyzing and/or to decompile code for any commercial projectĪctivation and using VB Decompiler in a company (one license for one developer) Save procedures list to the MAP file, IDA script or to the HIEW Names file Save a decompiled data to the single file Powerfull HEX Editor with Copy/Paste and Undo/Redo features Recovery prototypes of most standard Win32 APIsĪnti-decompilation features to protect your software (obfuscator) Recovery and edit the String References with unicode support Two decompilation schemes (with and without stack parsing) ![]() Universal x86 unpacker for packed applications (supported UPX, NSPack and other popular compressing tools) Partially Native Code decompilation (using code emulation engine)ĭisassembling Visual Studio. Native Code procedures disassembling (with powerfull Pentium Pro disassembler, with support of the MMX and FPU instruction sets) Processing COM OLE objects, API calls, etc. Recovery pseudo code to the standard Visual Basic instructions with a highest success rate. We offer 5 different licenses for VB Decompiler: Lite, Personal, Business, Business with Tracing Features and Business with Analytic Featuresĭecompiling of the forms (frm and frx) and usercontrols (ctl, ctx)Ĭode decompilation for the P-Code compiled applications. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |